If a president, gender notwithstanding, wants to be tagged an empowerist, he or she needs to think from the core that empowerment strategies, tactics and presumptions have at least something to offer each and every discussion, and definitely important policy positions and the words that make them happen.
Accordingly, if our particular president of the United States wants to give the richest of rich more tax savings against his promises, the least he absolutely needs to do is use such a mindset to come up with something more than just give them the money and worry about it later. There are ways to ingrate empowerment thinking into legislative proposals--though we seldom actually see inspired innovation on this front.
Why not cut and divide the richest out and create a new segment so they get their benefits if they EARN them by investing them into, I don't know, new jobs, underwriting career transitional training free for displaced workers, advocacy initiatives that help address social injustices within their business sector? We do “transportation” taxes that are aligned with an action and purpose. So what’s to stop policy creators from thinking in a similar manner and generating truly innovative financial incentives? If done correctly, who would necessarily cry about the private sector kingpins putting their money where their complaints come from?
You can always comment privately to ProgressDeceptors@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anger is good; intelligent anger, commentary and accuracy is better!